Does intention influence the tasking?
Does intention influence the tasking?
by Psyforce on Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:39 pm
A former military RV-er and trainer stated that the intention of the tasker is of no influence on what the remote viewer will perceive. The written cue stands and not the intention of the person who set up that cue.
I have to say I disagree on the statement that the intention of the tasker is of no influence on the RV process. According to the quantum physics every thought is energy, as much as every 'solid' material is just another energy pattern. Those energy patterns do influence each other. And any mental action causes another reaction, by sending out waves of energy.
Do we get to see what the tasker intended or do we get to see what the tasker wrote down as the targets cue? Both are very much reality. Therefor we can not exclude that we get one of the two realities. Both exists simultaneously, until the RV-er chooses to view one of them.
Hence the "Schrodingers cat effect".
I have to say I disagree on the statement that the intention of the tasker is of no influence on the RV process. According to the quantum physics every thought is energy, as much as every 'solid' material is just another energy pattern. Those energy patterns do influence each other. And any mental action causes another reaction, by sending out waves of energy.
Do we get to see what the tasker intended or do we get to see what the tasker wrote down as the targets cue? Both are very much reality. Therefor we can not exclude that we get one of the two realities. Both exists simultaneously, until the RV-er chooses to view one of them.
Hence the "Schrodingers cat effect".
Re: Does intention influence the tasking?
by Enki on Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:42 pm
For me, i'd have to say that the only intention involved in setting a task would be that of finding something interesting to look at, something interesting from a conversational point of view and something of interest from an RV point of view.... in fact the need to do anymore than present what you want to present seems completely unnecessary, and i believe one might muddy the task by involving all sorts of other things like computers, frames around pictures, or something else that might be on one's mind at the time, .. and why?, when simply setting up a picture with a TRN or formulating a cue with a TRN is all that one has to do, that works just fine, and as far as i can tell at this stage of my RV childhood i have seen very little to prove otherwise and in fact ive seen a body of evidence to suggest that in the wrong hands intention can and does interfere with target setting.
As for formulating cue's, i think that a good deal of thought (for me anyway) should go into that, i mean you get what you ask for, you dont want to be using the wrong words, you've got to get the cue right, something i seem reluctant to practise for some reason, must be that inertia thing i have going on when things are a good idea to get on with!!!! probably self sabotaging from my unconscious, i wonder if i started using intention, would my self sabotaging self interfere with that process... do you think i should try??? and am i crazy??
I prefer to keep things as simple as possible, i think that intention is great when you want to incorporate it into say astral projection, i think if someone came and 'got you' and bid you fly off with them halfway round the world and it was intention driven, then they should keep on doing it cos it works just fine, even if you do fall in the ocean en route...
when i prep myself for a session there is quite a lot of things i do before hand, to decrease the amount of disturbances, throw the cats out, unplug the fones, all of that is intention driven as i intended to have a session, and i want it to go well with no disturbances etc ....
How does one use intention to set a task anyhow?
Regards Enki
As for formulating cue's, i think that a good deal of thought (for me anyway) should go into that, i mean you get what you ask for, you dont want to be using the wrong words, you've got to get the cue right, something i seem reluctant to practise for some reason, must be that inertia thing i have going on when things are a good idea to get on with!!!! probably self sabotaging from my unconscious, i wonder if i started using intention, would my self sabotaging self interfere with that process... do you think i should try??? and am i crazy??
I prefer to keep things as simple as possible, i think that intention is great when you want to incorporate it into say astral projection, i think if someone came and 'got you' and bid you fly off with them halfway round the world and it was intention driven, then they should keep on doing it cos it works just fine, even if you do fall in the ocean en route...
when i prep myself for a session there is quite a lot of things i do before hand, to decrease the amount of disturbances, throw the cats out, unplug the fones, all of that is intention driven as i intended to have a session, and i want it to go well with no disturbances etc ....
How does one use intention to set a task anyhow?
Regards Enki
Greetingss
by R.Hilleard on Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:15 pm
Greetings and Welcome to the forum Enki,
It would appear that different camps ( RV instructors ) support different idea's.
True, intention is present when setting a TRN to a photo or even formulating a cue,
But to what degree and how, IMHO is yet to be fully explained... maybe something to
do with Quantum Mechanics.
The wording in formulating a cue is paramount, I speak from experience.
I have made a very simple one letter addition and it altered the whole outcome
of the constructed cue...again, yes you get what you ask for !. I would suggest
that you begin writing cue's a small pool. come back to them a week later and read
each one to see if you could improve the wording on each, this should help you with
setting out a good cue.
A good book to get is D Morehouse book Remote Viewing a complete user's manual.
The KISS principle is a good one to go by and will apply here. Go to it . . . do some cue's.
You are correct, reducing the amount of "noise" and disturbances around you is good, this in turn begins to get you "in the mode". Some call it a cool down, some an adjusting of the brain waves.
Try a different "intent" when setting a cue and see what happens, let us know !
regards
Rick
It would appear that different camps ( RV instructors ) support different idea's.
True, intention is present when setting a TRN to a photo or even formulating a cue,
But to what degree and how, IMHO is yet to be fully explained... maybe something to
do with Quantum Mechanics.
The wording in formulating a cue is paramount, I speak from experience.
I have made a very simple one letter addition and it altered the whole outcome
of the constructed cue...again, yes you get what you ask for !. I would suggest
that you begin writing cue's a small pool. come back to them a week later and read
each one to see if you could improve the wording on each, this should help you with
setting out a good cue.
A good book to get is D Morehouse book Remote Viewing a complete user's manual.
The KISS principle is a good one to go by and will apply here. Go to it . . . do some cue's.
You are correct, reducing the amount of "noise" and disturbances around you is good, this in turn begins to get you "in the mode". Some call it a cool down, some an adjusting of the brain waves.
Try a different "intent" when setting a cue and see what happens, let us know !
regards
Rick
